Singleton Law Group "The Court finds that counsel's statement was a purposeful attempt to deceive the Court.  The discrepancy between what was represented to the Court and what was the truth is such a large and glaring one as to obviate any belief that the misstatement was the product of mistake or oversight on counsel's part."  [See page 8, lines 13-17 of document to right=>] Click to view. "Plaintiff's counsel's billing practices are nothing short of appalling.  Counsel may rest assured that any future request for fees and costs made to this Court will be subjected to the absolute strictest scrutiny."  [See footnote 8 on page 7 of document to right =>] Click to view. Mr. Singleton claimed: "I have handled many hundreds of access cases. . . . Very large casinos in Nevada, the state of California, several counties and cities, as well as other very large corporate chains have attempted to defense some of my clients.  All have failed."  [see highlighted text on second page of document to right =>] Click to view. But was that really true? See case at right, in which the State of California prevailed (see item 98 of docket to right =>) and a judgment of $2,315.68 was awarded against his client (see entry at 7/11/03 in document to the right =>). Click to view. Mr. Singleton claimed: "PLAINTIFF'S attorney has made a thorough investigation of the Subject Property and represents through PLAINTIFF that he is not aware of any other violations of any laws governing access to the disabled at the Subject Property." [see paragraph 11 on page 6 of document at right and signature at page 8; note court file stamp on first page =>]  But was that really true?  Q: " . . . to the best of your knowledge, is that correct?" Mr. Singleton: "That was a term that the defendant's attorney wanted" Q: "But is it true?" Mr. Singleton: "I don't think I ever went to that property." [see highlights at pages 3 and 4 of attached document] Watch out! The ultimate threat: If he proposes trading his client's claim against yours in exchange for a malpractice claim against you, would some clients find this irresistible? (see documents to right =>) Each of the following lawsuits (100% of those we've been able to obtain) claims the plaintiff was physically injured (see paragraph 48 of each complaint): 01cv146 Collins v Felcor 01cv176 Collins v Fresh Pies 01cv767 Collins v Consolidated 01cv925 Collins v Ocean 01cv1161 Collins v Hitchcock Complaint 01cv2521 Collins v Sears 01cv7936 Collins v Banter 01cv9922 Collins v City of Indio 01cv11211 Collins v Marie Callender 02cv397 Collins v RTA Desert (transfered to 02cv7985) 02cv422 Collins v La Quinta Plaza 02cv965 Collins V Main Street 02cv1329 Collins v Vons 02cv1343 Collins v Mock 02cv1373 Collins v Hsusn 02cv2574 Collins v Hilton 02cv 4942 Collins v Albertson's 02cv7985 Collins v RTA Desert 02cv9875 Collins v Patel 03cv128 Collins v Del Taco 03cv1490 Collins v Casa Guadalajara 02cv3383 Escobedo v Little Jocko's 02cv3921 Escobedo v QS San Luis Obispo 02cv6161 Escobedo v RKK Hospitality 02cv6295 Escobedo v King Ventures 02cv9053 Escobedo v Panchal   02cv619 Hohlbein v Karleskint 02cv878 Hohlbein v Everquest 02cv4281 Hohlbein v Curly Redwood 03cv3981 Hohlbein v Bay Area Diablo Petroleum 03cv4369 Hohlbein v W&W Mobile Home Sales   03cv0073 Hopkins v Dahliwahl 03cv781 Hopkins v Grand Obispo   01cv1188 Marsh v GA Enterprises (Transferred to 02cv5202) 01cv1193 Marsh v Coe 02cv5202 Marsh v. GA Enterprises 02cv7120 Marsh v. San Ysidro BB Properties 03cv780 Marsh v Petersen   03cv1453 Auer v Hanford Hotels 02cv4136 Bohl v Oliver 01cv1884 Brisbon v Corkill 02cv372 Darbey-Key v Concal 02cv933 Duckstein v Houyen 03cv977 Evans v Monterey Inst 03cv0515 Geiger v Big Oil 03cv975 McEwen v Slack & Winzler 02cv3713 McMahon v Pizza with Pizzazz 03cv269 Smith v Promenade     01cv464 Van Vuren v Universal 03cv873 Wilkie v Shomler 03cv1529 Wong v Hung Shing This website is brought to you by ADAaccountability and Citizens Against Predatory Lawsuits. By your continued viewing or use of this website you thereby agree to and acknowledge the Terms of Use, Privacy Policy and Copyright Policy. If you do not acknowledge and agree to those terms and conditions, please leave this site immediately and make no further use of any of the content therein. © 2003-06 ADA Accountability